ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Integrating Patient-Specific Information into Logic Models of Complex Diseases: Application to Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solubility based mechanistic profiling of combinatorial drug therapy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- KGBN: Augmenting and optimizing logical gene regulatory networks using knowledge graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Computational modelling of aggressive B-cell lymphoma.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- LM-Merger: a workflow for merging logical models with an application to gene regulatory network models.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Patient-Specific Modeling of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Combining Mass Spectrometry-Based Phosphoproteomics with a Network-Based Approach to Reveal FLT3-Dependent Mechanisms of Chemoresistance.Proteomes · 2021Review
- Assembling Disease Networks From Causal Interaction Resources.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High throughput technologies such as deep sequencing and proteomics are increasingly becoming mainstream in clinical practice and support diagnosis and patient stratification. Developing computational models that recapitulate cell physiology and its perturbations in disease is a required step to help with the interpretation of results of high content experiments and to devise personalized treatments. As complete cell-models are difficult to achieve, given limited experimental information and insurmountable computational problems, approximate approaches should be considered. We present here a general approach to modeling complex diseases by embedding patient-specific genomics data into actionable logic models that take into account prior knowledge. We apply the strategy to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and assemble a network of logical relationships linking most of the genes that are found frequently mutated in AML patients. We derive Boolean models from this network and we show that by priming the model with genomic data we can infer relevant patient-specific clinical features. Here we propose that the integration of literature-derived causal networks with patient-specific data should be explored to help bedside decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.