Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33578891›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Transfer Learning in Breast Cancer Diagnoses via Ultrasound Imaging.

Gelan Ayana, Kokeb Dese, Se-Woon Choe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. GPT-Driven Radiology Report Generation with Fine-Tuned Llama 3.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gelan AyanaDepartment of Medical IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39253, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5219-6098
Kokeb DeseSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Jimma University, Jimma 378, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-3591-9570
Se-Woon ChoeDepartment of Medical IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39253, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-4147

Funding

Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project Dept. of IT Convergence, Kumoh National Institute of TechnologyNational Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1F1A1062397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transfer learning is a machine learning approach that reuses a learning method developed for a task as the starting point for a model on a target task. The goal of transfer learning is to improve performance of target learners by transferring the knowledge contained in other (but related) source domains. As a result, the need for large numbers of target-domain data is lowered for constructing target learners. Due to this immense property, transfer learning techniques are frequently used in ultrasound breast cancer image analyses. In this review, we focus on transfer learning methods applied on ultrasound breast image classification and detection from the perspective of transfer learning approaches, pre-processing, pre-training models, and convolutional neural network (CNN) models. Finally, comparison of different works is carried out, and challenges-as well as outlooks-are discussed.

Indexed as

breast cancertransfer learningultrasound

Identifiers

PMID33578891
PMCPMC7916666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.