ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Understanding LSTM Network Behaviour of IMU-Based Locomotion Mode Recognition for Applications in Prostheses and Wearables.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons for Upper Limb Rehabilitation: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Optimizing Sensor and Data Selection on Lower Limbs via Deep Learning for Real-Time Human Activity Recognition.IEEE transactions on human-machine systems · 2026Article
- Cow Behavior Recognition Based on Wearable Nose Rings.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Predicting quantum emitter fluctuations with time-series forecasting models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Estimating Rotational Acceleration in Shoulder and Elbow Joints Using a Transformer Algorithm and a Fusion of Biosignals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automatic Radar-Based Step Length Measurement in the Home for Older Adults Living with Frailty.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of AI for Short-Term PV Generation Forecast.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Real-Time Human Activity Recognition with IMU and Encoder Sensors in Wearable Exoskeleton Robot via Deep Learning Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Adaptive Lower Limb Pattern Recognition for Multi-Day Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Deep learning with an attention mechanism for continuous biomechanical motion estimation across varied activities.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Locomotion Mode Transition Prediction Based on Gait-Event Identification Using Wearable Sensors and Multilayer Perceptrons.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Estimation of Mechanical Power Output Employing Deep Learning on Inertial Measurement Data in Roller Ski Skating.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Locomotion Mode Recognition Algorithm Based on Gaussian Mixture Model Using IMU Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Locomotion Mode Recognition with Inertial Signals for Hip Joint Exoskeleton.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human Locomotion Mode Recognition (LMR) has the potential to be used as a control mechanism for lower-limb active prostheses. Active prostheses can assist and restore a more natural gait for amputees, but as a medical device it must minimize user risks, such as falls and trips. As such, any control system must have high accuracy and robustness, with a detailed understanding of its internal operation. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) machine-learning networks can perform LMR with high accuracy levels. However, the internal behavior during classification is unknown, and they struggle to generalize when presented with novel users. The target problem addressed in this paper is understanding the LSTM classification behavior for LMR. A dataset of six locomotive activities (walking, stopped, stairs and ramps) from 22 non-amputee subjects is collected, capturing both steady-state and transitions between activities in natural environments. Non-amputees are used as a substitute for amputees to provide a larger dataset. The dataset is used to analyze the internal behavior of a reduced complexity LSTM network. This analysis identifies that the model primarily classifies activity type based on data around early stance. Evaluation of generalization for unseen subjects reveals low sensitivity to hyper-parameters and over-fitting to individuals' gait traits. Investigating the differences between individual subjects showed that gait variations between users primarily occur in early stance, potentially explaining the poor generalization. Adjustment of hyper-parameters alone could not solve this, demonstrating the need for individual personalization of models. The main achievements of the paper are (i) the better understanding of LSTM for LMR, (ii) demonstration of its low sensitivity to learning hyper-parameters when evaluating novel user generalization, and (iii) demonstration of the need for personalization of ML models to achieve acceptable accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.