Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33578759›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

Nipple Sparing Mastectomy as a Risk-Reducing Procedure for BRCA-Mutated Patients.

Nicola Rocco, Giacomo Montagna, Carmen Criscitiello, Maurizio Bruno Nava, Francesca Privitera, Wafa Taher, Antonio Gloria, Giuseppe Catanuto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicola RoccoG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6941-7873
Giacomo MontagnaBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Carmen CriscitielloDepartment of Oncology and Haematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Maurizio Bruno NavaG.RE.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1539-5108
Francesca PriviteraMultidisciplinary Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, 95021 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0654-3789
Wafa TaherSurrey and Sussex Health Care, NHS Trust, London W1W 5EF, UK.
Antonio GloriaInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials-National Research Council of Italy, 80125 Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe CatanutoMultidisciplinary Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, 95021 Catania, Italy.
Center For Reconstructive Urethral Surgery · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Research Council · ITSurrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing numbers of asymptomatic women who become aware of carrying a breast cancer gene mutation (BRCA) mutation are choosing to undergo risk-reducing bilateral mastectomies with immediate breast reconstruction. We reviewed the literature with the aim of assessing the oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as a risk-reduction procedure in BRCA-mutated patients. Nine studies reporting on the incidence of primary breast cancer post NSM in asymptomatic BRCA mutated patients undergoing risk-reducing bilateral procedures met the inclusion criteria. NSM appears to be a safe option for BRCA mutation carriers from an oncological point of view, with low reported rates of new breast cancers, low rates of postoperative complications, and high levels of satisfaction and postoperative quality of life. However, larger multi-institutional studies with longer follow-up are needed to establish this procedure as the best surgical option in this setting.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAsymptomatic DiseasesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene ExpressionHumansMammaplastyMastectomyMiddle AgedNipplesQuality of LifeBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA mutationsbreast cancernipple-sparing mastectomiesrisk reduction

Identifiers

PMID33578759
PMCPMC7916475
OpenAlexW3126681245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.