ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Fast Identification of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) of Digestive and Nervous Systems of Organic Drugs by In Silico Models.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to discover concurrences of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and derive models of the most frequent items of ADRs based on the SIDER database, which included 1430 marketed drugs and 5868 ADRs. First, common ADRs of organic drugs were manually reclassified according to side effects in the human system and followed by an association rule analysis, which found ADRs of digestive and nervous systems often occurred at the same time with a good association rule. Then, three algorithms, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM) and deep learning, were used to derive models of ADRs of digestive and nervous systems based on 497 organic monomer drugs and to identify key structural features in defining these ADRs. The statistical results indicated that these kinds of QSAR models were good tools for screening ADRs of digestive and nervous systems, which gave the ROC AUC values of 81.5%, 98.9%, 91.5%, 69.5%, 78.4% and 78.8%, respectively. Then, these models were applied to investigate ADRs of 1536 organic compounds with four phase and zero rule-of-five (RO5) violations from the ChEMBL database. Based on the consensus ADRs' predictions of models, 58.1% and 42.6% of compounds were predicted to cause these two ADRs, respectively, indicating the significance of initial assessment of ADRs in early drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.