Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33578672›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Carbapenem Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Adult Patients and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Sharon Lechtig-Wasserman, Hans Liebisch-Rey, Nicolas Diaz-Pinilla, Jhosep Blanco, Yuli-Viviana Fuentes-Barreiro, Rosa-Helena Bustos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Experience with Implementing a Beta-lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Service in a Burn Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Chart Review.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Serious Neurological Adverse Events of Ceftriaxone.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharon Lechtig-WassermanEvidence-Based Therapeutics Group, Clinical Pharmacology, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6292-8742
Hans Liebisch-ReyEvidence-Based Therapeutics Group, Clinical Pharmacology, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-4836
Nicolas Diaz-PinillaEvidence-Based Therapeutics Group, Clinical Pharmacology, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia.
Jhosep BlancoEvidence-Based Therapeutics Group, Clinical Pharmacology, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5510-4742
Yuli-Viviana Fuentes-BarreiroEvidence-Based Therapeutics Group, Clinical Pharmacology, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-8195
Rosa-Helena BustosEvidence-Based Therapeutics Group, Clinical Pharmacology, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-2299
Universidad de La Sabana · CO

Funding

Minciencias 850-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug monitoring is one strategy of antibiotic stewardship to face antimicrobial resistance. This strategy could have a determinant role in critically ill patients treated with carbapenems to overcome pharmacokinetic variability, reduce the risk of subtherapeutic dosage or toxicity, and reduce the risks inherent to treatment. However, the effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is unknown. This paper aims to identify TDM effectiveness in critically ill patients treated with carbapenems. English and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to identify relevant studies evaluating carbapenem TDM. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative cohort studies were selected for inclusion if they compared carbapenem TDM to standard care in adult critically ill or sepsis/septic shock patients. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, clinical cure, microbiological eradication, antimicrobial resistance, drug-related side effects, and achievement of target plasma concentrations. Overall, performing carbapenem TDM was not associated with a decrease in mortality. However, it could be evidence for a relationship with clinical cure as well as target attainment. Some studies found favorable outcomes related to clinical and microbiological responses, such as lower procalcitonin levels at the end of the monitored therapy compared to standard care. For the primary and secondary outcomes analyzed, strong evidence was not identified, which could be due to the size, risk of bias, and design of selected studies.

Indexed as

antibiotic treatment outcomeantimicrobial drug resistancecarbapenemscritical illnessgram-negative bacteriasepsisseptic shocktherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33578672
PMCPMC7916352
OpenAlexW3126455369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.