Observational studyMedicine2021
Efficacy of an inpatient smoking cessation program at a single regional cancer center: A prospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Korean Clinical Practice Guideline of Korean Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (KSRNT) and National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) on Treatment of Tobacco Use 2024.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Guideline
- Impact of Quitting Smoking at Diagnosis on Overall Survival in Lung Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Effective Timing of Introducing an Inpatient Smoking Cessation Program to Cancer Patients.Yonsei medical journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractSmoking is the leading cause of preventable death and a risk factor for cancer, but smoking cessation is difficult even in patients who need hospitalization. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of an inpatient smoking cessation consultation program and to analyze the clinical factors associated with abstinence. In this observational study, patients received regular counseling for 6 months, and abstinence was objectively assessed via urine and exhaled carbon monoxide testing. Cessation rates were assessed at 4 weeks and 6 months, and clinical characteristics associated with cessation success were investigated. Of the 571 patients referred to participate in the program, 170 (29.8%) were enrolled, and only 2 (1.2%) used smoking cessation drugs in addition to counseling. The smoking cessation rate was 77.6% after 4 weeks and 59.1% after 6 months. The cessation rates were significantly higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer at both timepoints (63.8% vs 21.9%, P < .001, 53.6% vs 12.5%, P < .001), and they were also higher in the first admission group than in the re-admission group (87.4% vs 74.7%, P = .033, 88.5% vs 76.1%, P = .037). In patients with lung cancer, progression-free survival and overall survival tended to be better in those enrolled in the program (P = .158, P = .183). In conclusion, the inpatient smoking cessation program was associated with a high abstinence rate. Most patients maintained cessation without medication, suggesting that initial admission, along with a cancer diagnosis, can provide enough motivation to abstain from smoking. In addition, the smoking cessation effort showed potential to improve survival during lung cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.