ArticleMedicine2021
The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with functional task training on motor recovery in stroke patients.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04646577 (The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Functional Task Training on Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Functional Task Training on Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Motivation Regarding Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Among Rehabilitation Specialists in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Knowledge and attitude toward transcranial magnetic stimulation among rehabilitation specialists in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMotor deficits are common after stroke and are a major contributor to stroke-related disability and the potential for long-lasting neurobiological consequences of stroke remains unresolved. There are only a few treatments available for the improvement of motor function in stroke patients. However, the mechanisms underlying stroke recovery remain poorly understood, and effective neurorehabilitation interventions remain insufficiently proven for widespread implementation.
methodsHerein, we propose to enhance the effects of brain plasticity using a powerful noninvasive technique for brain modulation consisting of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) priming with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in combination with motor-training-like constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Our hypothesis is that navigated low-frequency rTMS stimulus priming with precise location provided by neuronavigation on the healthy side of the brain and with anodal tDCS on the affected side combined with CIMT will induce a greater motor function improvement than that obtained with sham tDCS combined with CIMT alone. We predict that the application of this technique will result in a large reduction in cortical excitability and dis-inhibition in the affected hemisphere and lead to improvements in behavioral measures of hand function in stroke patients. DISCUSSION: The proposed study, therefore, is important for several reasons. The results could potentially lead to improved stroke therapeutics, and the approach makes use of 2 potential pathways to modulate brain function.
trial registrationThis study protocol was registered in Clinical Trials Registry (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04646577). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam. The results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, social media, broadcast media, print media, the internet and various community/stakeholder engagement activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.