Trial reportMedicine2021
Comparison of the effects of shortening rest intervals on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, physiological parameters, and hemodynamic parameters in well-trained rescuers: Randomized simulation study.
Trial report in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal trends in chest compression quality during a metronome-guided CPR simulation: a secondary analysis of the RITMICO study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Release velocity ImprovemenT with a new Metronome guIding chest COmpressions: The RITMICO simulation study.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance depends on individual ability and training. Well-trained or professional rescuers can maintain high-quality CPR for longer than laypeople. This study aimed to examine the effects of reducing resting intervals on CPR performance, physiological parameters, and hemodynamic parameters during prolonged CPR in well-trained providers.
methodsThe study enrolled 90 volunteers from the paramedic students of our institution. They were randomly divided into 3 groups: 2 minutes, 1 minute 45 seconds, and 1 minute 30 seconds rest groups. Each participant performed 5 cycles of chest compression only CPR (2 min/cycle) with different resting intervals according to grouping. CPR quality, physiological variations, and hemodynamic variations were measured for each cycle and compared across the groups.
resultsOf the 90 volunteers, 79 well-trained providers were finally included. The variation of the average chest compression depth across the 5 cycles showed significant differences between the 3 groups: from cycle 1 to 2: 1.2 (3.1) mm, -0.8 (2.0) mm, and -2.0 (3.0) mm in the 2 minutes, 1 minute 45 seconds, and 1 minute 30 seconds groups, respectively (P < .001); from cycle 1 to 3: 0.0 (3.0) mm, -0.7 (3.2) mm, and -2.6 (3.9) mm, respectively (P = .030). However, all 3 groups maintained the recommended rate and chest compression depth for all 5 cycles. Physiological and hemodynamic parameters showed no significant differences between the groups.
conclusionsWell-trained providers were able to maintain high-quality CPR despite reducing rest intervals. Adjusting the rest interval may help maintain overall CPR quality in special situations or where layperson rescuers are involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.