Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33578590›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

Magnetic resonance tractography of the lumbosacral plexus: Step-by-step.

Ibrahim Ibrahim, Antonín Škoch, Vít Herynek, Filip Jírů, Jaroslav Tintěra

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06418243 (Non-interventional Study on the Contribution of 3D Modelling in Surgical Management of Pediatric Retroperitoneal and Pelvic Tumors Compared to 2D Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06418243 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Non-interventional Study on the Contribution of 3D Modelling in Surgical Management of Pediatric Retroperitoneal and Pelvic Tumors Compared to 2D Imaging

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsPelvic Tumor, Retroperitoneal Tumor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Magnetic resonance tractography of the brachial plexus: step-by-step.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ibrahim IbrahimDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, MR Unit.ORCID 0000-0003-3530-5165
Antonín ŠkochDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, MR Unit.
Vít HerynekCenter for Advanced Preclinical Imaging, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1775-2394
Filip JírůDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, MR Unit.
Jaroslav TintěraDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, MR Unit.
Apple (Israel) · ILS.P.E.C.I.E.S. · US

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky 17-28587A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractMR tractography of the lumbosacral plexus (LSP) is challenging due to the difficulty of acquiring high quality data and accurately estimating the neuronal tracts. We proposed an algorithm for an accurate visualization and assessment of the major LSP bundles using the segmentation of the cauda equina as seed points for the initial starting area for the fiber tracking algorithm.Twenty-six healthy volunteers underwent MRI examinations on a 3T MR scanner using the phased array coils with optimized measurement protocols for diffusion-weighted images and coronal T2 weighted 3D short-term inversion recovery sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using varying flip angle evaluation sequences used for LSP fiber reconstruction and MR neurography (MRN).The fiber bundles reconstruction was optimized in terms of eliminating the muscle fibers contamination using the segmentation of cauda equina, the effects of the normalized quantitative anisotropy (NQA) and angular threshold on reconstruction of the LSP. In this study, the NQA parameter has been used for fiber tracking instead of fractional anisotropy (FA) and the regions of interest positioning was precisely adjusted bilaterally and symmetrically in each individual subject.The diffusion data were processed in individual L3-S2 nerve fibers using the generalized Q-sampling imaging algorithm. Data (mean FA, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity, and normalized quantitative anisotropy) were statistically analyzed using the linear mixed-effects model. The MR neurography was performed in MedINRIA and post-processed using the maximum intensity projection method to demonstrate LSP tracts in multiple planes.FA values significantly decreased towards the sacral region (P < .001); by contrast, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity and NQA values significantly increased towards the sacral region (P < .001).Fiber tractography of the LSP was feasible in all examined subjects and closely corresponded with the nerves visible in the maximum intensity projection images of MR neurography. Usage of NQA instead of FA in the proposed algorithm enabled better separation of muscle and nerve fibers.The presented algorithm yields a high quality reconstruction of the LSP bundles that may be helpful both in research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsAnisotropyCauda EquinaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLumbosacral PlexusLumbosacral RegionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSpinal Nerves

Identifiers

PMID33578590
PMCPMC10545402
OpenAlexW3128183830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.