ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2021
Automatic segmentation, feature extraction and comparison of healthy and stroke cerebral vasculature.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated CTA-Derived Collateral Grading and Morphologic Metrics for Enhanced Prediction of Poststroke Outcomes.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Cerebrovascular Analysis for Improved Prediction of Post-Stroke Complications.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Assessing the Functional Severity of Carotid Artery Stenosis Using an Image-Based Hemodynamic Modeling Method.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Cerebrovascular CTA radiomics for objective collateral grading in acute ischemic stroke.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Quantitative Cerebrovascular Analysis for Improved Prediction of Post-Stroke Complications.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond Recanalization: Machine Learning-Based Insights into Postthrombectomy Vascular Morphology in Patients with Stroke.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Morphologic characteristics of distal intracranial arteries in relation to structural changes in the brain after chronic alcohol consumption.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cerebrovascular morphology: Insights into normal variations, aging effects and disease implications.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025Review
- Deep learning for 3D vascular segmentation in hierarchical phase contrast tomography: a case study on kidney.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reconstructing blood flow in data-poor regimes: a vasculature network kernel for Gaussian process regression.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Deep Learning for 3D Vascular Segmentation in Phase Contrast Tomography.Research square · 2024Article
- Simulation of Image-Guided Microwave Ablation Therapy Using a Digital Twin Computational Model.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- A dataset of rodent cerebrovasculature from in vivo multiphoton fluorescence microscopy imaging.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Vascular perfusion differs in two distinct PDGFRβ-positive zones within the ischemic core of male mice 2 weeks following photothrombotic stroke.Journal of neuroscience research · 2023Article
- End to end stroke triage using cerebrovascular morphology and machine learning.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Brain Hemodynamic Predictions Using Medical Imaging.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2022Article
- Novel imaging markers for altered cerebrovascular morphology in aging, stroke, and Alzheimer's disease.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022Article
- An evaluation of performance measures for arterial brain vessel segmentation.BMC medical imaging · 2021Article
- Ultrasound, photoacoustic, and magnetic resonance imaging to study hyperacute pathophysiology of traumatic and vascular brain injury.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of cerebral vasculature and a quantitative assessment of its morphology is critical to various diagnostic and therapeutic purposes and is pertinent to studying brain health and disease. However, this is still a challenging task due to the complexity of the vascular imaging data. We propose an automated method for cerebral vascular segmentation without the need of any manual intervention as well as a method to skeletonize the binary segmented map to extract vascular geometric features and characterize vessel structure. We combine a Hessian-based probabilistic vessel-enhancing filtering with an active-contour-based technique to segment magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiograms (MRA and CTA) and subsequently extract the vessel centerlines and diameters to calculate the geometrical properties of the vasculature. Our method was validated using a 3D phantom of the Circle-of-Willis region, demonstrating 84% mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 85% mean Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) with minimal modified Hausdorff distance (MHD) error (3 surface pixels at most), and showed superior performance compared to existing segmentation algorithms upon quantitative comparison using DSC, PCC and MHD. We subsequently applied our algorithm to a dataset of 40 subjects, including 1) MRA scans of healthy subjects (n = 10, age = 30 ± 9), 2) MRA scans of stroke patients (n = 10, age = 51 ± 15), 3) CTA scans of healthy subjects (n = 10, age = 62 ± 12), and 4) CTA scans of stroke patients (n = 10, age = 68 ± 11), and obtained a quantitative comparison between the stroke and normal vasculature for both imaging modalities. The vascular network in stroke patients compared to age-adjusted healthy subjects was found to have a significantly (p < 0.05) higher tortuosity (3.24 ± 0.88 rad/cm vs. 7.17 ± 1.61 rad/cm for MRA, and 4.36 ± 1.32 rad/cm vs. 7.80 ± 0.92 rad/cm for CTA), higher fractal dimension (1.36 ± 0.28 vs. 1.71 ± 0.14 for MRA, and 1.56 ± 0.05 vs. 1.69 ± 0.20 for CTA), lower total length (3.46 ± 0.99 m vs. 2.20 ± 0.67 m for CTA), lower total volume (61.80 ± 18.79 ml vs. 34.43 ± 22.9 ml for CTA), lower average diameter (2.4 ± 0.21 mm vs. 2.18 ± 0.07 mm for CTA), and lower average branch length (4.81 ± 1.97 mm vs. 8.68 ± 2.03 mm for MRA), respectively. We additionally studied the change in vascular features with respect to aging and imaging modality. While we observed differences between features as a result of aging, statistical analysis did not show any significant differences, whereas we found that the number of branches were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the two imaging modalities (201 ± 73 for MRA vs. 189 ± 69 for CTA). Our segmentation and feature extraction algorithm can be applied on any imaging modality and can be used in the future to automatically obtain the 3D segmented vasculature for diagnosis and treatment planning as well as to study morphological changes due to stroke and other cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.