Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33578323›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2021

Automatic segmentation, feature extraction and comparison of healthy and stroke cerebral vasculature.

Aditi Deshpande, Nima Jamilpour, Bin Jiang, Patrik Michel, Ashraf Eskandari, Chelsea Kidwell, Max Wintermark, Kaveh Laksari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebrovascular morphology: Insights into normal variations, aging effects and disease implications.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Simulation of Image-Guided Microwave Ablation Therapy Using a Digital Twin Computational Model.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Novel imaging markers for altered cerebrovascular morphology in aging, stroke, and Alzheimer's disease.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aditi DeshpandeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, United States.
Nima JamilpourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, United States.
Bin JiangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, United States.
Patrik MichelDepartment of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ashraf EskandariDepartment of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chelsea KidwellDepartment of Neurology, University of Arizona, United States.
Max WintermarkDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, United States.
Kaveh LaksariDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, United States; Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Arizona, United States. Electronic address: klaksari@arizona.edu.
University of Arizona · USStanford University · USUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Noninvasive Real-time Estimation of Cerebral Blood Flow for Personalized Stroke AssessmentR03NS108167 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BABAEE, HESSAM, LAKSARI, KAVEH · 2019 to 2020
$161k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS108167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of cerebral vasculature and a quantitative assessment of its morphology is critical to various diagnostic and therapeutic purposes and is pertinent to studying brain health and disease. However, this is still a challenging task due to the complexity of the vascular imaging data. We propose an automated method for cerebral vascular segmentation without the need of any manual intervention as well as a method to skeletonize the binary segmented map to extract vascular geometric features and characterize vessel structure. We combine a Hessian-based probabilistic vessel-enhancing filtering with an active-contour-based technique to segment magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiograms (MRA and CTA) and subsequently extract the vessel centerlines and diameters to calculate the geometrical properties of the vasculature. Our method was validated using a 3D phantom of the Circle-of-Willis region, demonstrating 84% mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 85% mean Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) with minimal modified Hausdorff distance (MHD) error (3 surface pixels at most), and showed superior performance compared to existing segmentation algorithms upon quantitative comparison using DSC, PCC and MHD. We subsequently applied our algorithm to a dataset of 40 subjects, including 1) MRA scans of healthy subjects (n = 10, age = 30 ± 9), 2) MRA scans of stroke patients (n = 10, age = 51 ± 15), 3) CTA scans of healthy subjects (n = 10, age = 62 ± 12), and 4) CTA scans of stroke patients (n = 10, age = 68 ± 11), and obtained a quantitative comparison between the stroke and normal vasculature for both imaging modalities. The vascular network in stroke patients compared to age-adjusted healthy subjects was found to have a significantly (p < 0.05) higher tortuosity (3.24 ± 0.88 rad/cm vs. 7.17 ± 1.61 rad/cm for MRA, and 4.36 ± 1.32 rad/cm vs. 7.80 ± 0.92 rad/cm for CTA), higher fractal dimension (1.36 ± 0.28 vs. 1.71 ± 0.14 for MRA, and 1.56 ± 0.05 vs. 1.69 ± 0.20 for CTA), lower total length (3.46 ± 0.99 m vs. 2.20 ± 0.67 m for CTA), lower total volume (61.80 ± 18.79 ml vs. 34.43 ± 22.9 ml for CTA), lower average diameter (2.4 ± 0.21 mm vs. 2.18 ± 0.07 mm for CTA), and lower average branch length (4.81 ± 1.97 mm vs. 8.68 ± 2.03 mm for MRA), respectively. We additionally studied the change in vascular features with respect to aging and imaging modality. While we observed differences between features as a result of aging, statistical analysis did not show any significant differences, whereas we found that the number of branches were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the two imaging modalities (201 ± 73 for MRA vs. 189 ± 69 for CTA). Our segmentation and feature extraction algorithm can be applied on any imaging modality and can be used in the future to automatically obtain the 3D segmented vasculature for diagnosis and treatment planning as well as to study morphological changes due to stroke and other cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) in the clinic.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular DisordersStrokeAdultAgedAlgorithmsBrainHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultAutomatic segmentationCerebral vasculatureStrokeStroke vasculatureVascular feature extraction

Identifiers

PMID33578323
PMCPMC7875826
OpenAlexW3007025842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.