Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33578309›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

Understanding infection prevention behaviour in maternity wards: A mixed-methods analysis of hand hygiene in Zanzibar.

Mícheál de Barra, Giorgia Gon, Susannah Woodd, Wendy J Graham, Marijn de Bruin, Catherine Kahabuka, A Jess Williams, Khadidja Konate, Said M Ali, Rukaiya Said and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mícheál de BarraUniversity of Aberdeen, UK; Brunel University London, UK. Electronic address: micheal.debarra@brunel.ac.uk.
Giorgia GonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Susannah WooddLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Wendy J GrahamUniversity of Aberdeen, UK; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Marijn de BruinUniversity of Aberdeen, UK; IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands.
Catherine KahabukaCSK Research Solutions, Tanzania.
A Jess WilliamsUniversity of Aberdeen, UK; University of Birmingham, UK.
Khadidja Konate
Said M AliPublic Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri, Zanzibar.
Rukaiya SaidMinistry of Health Zanzibar, Zanzibar.
Loveday Penn-KekanaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N015975/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAlthough women in low- and middle-income countries are increasingly encouraged to give birth at facilities, healthcare-associated infection of both the mother and newborn remain common. An important cause of infection is poor hand hygiene. There is a need to understand how environmental, behavioural, and organisational factors influence hygiene practice.

objectiveTo understand variations between facilities and between people in hygiene behaviour and to explore potential intervention targets in four labour wards in Zanzibar.

methodsSite visits including observation of deliveries and of day-to-day workings of the facilities. Thirty-three semi-structured interviews, totalling more than 46 hours, with birth attendants, orderlies, managerial staff and mothers. Transcribed interviews and observation notes were read and coded by two authors. Themes were developed and analysed in light of existing research.

resultsThe physical preconditions for hand hygiene were met more regularly in the two highvolume facilities, where soap, water, gloves were almost always available. However, in all of the facilities, hand hygiene appeared impeded by poor ergonomics, like, for example, physical distance between water taps, gloves, or delivery beds. Recontamination of gloved hands following good hand hygiene was commonly observed, a pattern that the birth attendants attributed to high and unpredictable workload and equipment shortages. Interviews and focus groups suggested that birth attendants typically understood when and why hand hygiene should be implemented, and that they were aware of low handwashing rates among co-workers. In poorer performing facilities, managers were less inclined to visit wards and more likely to perceive hand hygiene as beyond their influence.

conclusionsObservations and interviews suggest improvements in the ergonomic design of delivery rooms, including convenient availability of sinks, soap, hand gel, hand towels and gloves, may be a low-cost way to reduce the infection burden from poor hand hygiene.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionHand HygieneFemaleGuideline AdherenceHand DisinfectionHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyTanzaniaHealth care professionalsHospital hygieneInfection prevention and controlQualitative approachRisk of hospital-acquired infection

Identifiers

PMID33578309
PMCPMC7938378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.