Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33578008›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2021

Impact of contact tracing, respect of isolation, and lockdown in reducing the number of cases infected with COVID-19. Case study: Tunisia's response from March 22 to May 4, 2020.

Olfa Saidi, Dhafer Malouche, Priyanka Saksena, Latifa Arfaoui, Khouloud Talmoudi, Aicha Hchaichi, Hend Bouguerra, Habiba Ben Romdhane, Mohamed Hsairi, Ramzi Ouhichi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modeling COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics: A Bibliometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olfa SaidiWorld Health Organization, Tunisia. Electronic address: saidio@who.int.
Dhafer MaloucheHigher School of Statistics and Data Analysis, University of Carthage, Tunisia.
Priyanka SaksenaWorld Health Organization, Tunisia.
Latifa ArfaouiWorld Health Organization, Tunisia.
Khouloud TalmoudiNational Observatory for New and Emerging Diseases (NONED), Tunisia.
Aicha HchaichiNational Observatory for New and Emerging Diseases (NONED), Tunisia.
Hend BouguerraNational Observatory for New and Emerging Diseases (NONED), Tunisia.
Habiba Ben RomdhaneFaculty of Medicine Tunis, University El Manar, Tunisia.
Mohamed HsairiTunisian Society of Epidemiologists, Faculty of Medicine Tunis, University El Manar, Tunisia.
Ramzi OuhichiWorld Health Organization, Tunisia.
Yves SouteyrandWorld Health Organization, Tunisia.
Nissaf Ben AlayaNational Observatory for New and Emerging Diseases (NONED), Tunisia.
NONED Working Group
National Institute of Meteorology · TNTunis University · TNUniversity of Carthage · TN

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly across the world. Tunisia reacted early to COVID-19, resulting in a low number of infections during the first wave of the pandemic. This study was performed to model the effects of different interventions on the evolution of cases and to compare these with the Tunisian experience.

methodsA stochastic transmission model was used to quantify the reduction in number of cases of COVID-19 with the interventions of contact tracing, compliance with isolation, and a general lockdown.

resultsIn the model, increasing contact tracing from 20% to 80% after the first 100 cases reduced the cumulative number of infections (CNI) by 52% in 1 month. Similarly, increased compliance with isolation from 20% to 80% after the first 100 cases reduced the CNI by 45%. These reductions were smaller if the interventions were implemented after 1000 cases. A general lockdown reduced the CNI by 97% after the first 100 cases. Tunisia implemented its general lockdown after 75 cases were confirmed, which reduced the cumulative number of infected cases by 86% among the general population.

conclusionsThis study shows that the early application of critical interventions contributes significantly to reducing infections and the evolution of COVID-19 in a country. Tunisia's early success with the control of COVID-19 is explained by its quick response.

Indexed as

Contact TracingCOVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansRespectSARS-CoV-2TunisiaContact tracingCOVID-19General lockdownIsolationModellingTunisia

Identifiers

PMID33578008
PMCPMC7872851
OpenAlexW3127810152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.