Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33577855›Full record

ArticleLife sciences2021

Screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection during labor and delivery using polymerase chain reaction and immunoglobulin testing.

Ricardo Savirón-Cornudella, Ana Villalba, Luis M Esteban, Mauricio Tajada, Belén Rodríguez-Solanilla, Mercedes Andeyro-Garcia, Javier Zapardiel, Segundo Rite, Berta Castán-Larraz, Faustino R Pérez-López

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo Savirón-CornudellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villalba General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: rsaviron@gmail.com.
Ana VillalbaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villalba General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Luis M EstebanEscuela Universitaria Politécnica de La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Mauricio TajadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Belén Rodríguez-SolanillaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Mercedes Andeyro-GarciaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villalba General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Javier ZapardielDepartment of Microbiology, Villalba General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Segundo RiteNeonatology Unit, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Berta Castán-LarrazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Pedro Hospital, Logroño, Spain.
Faustino R Pérez-LópezAragon Health Research Institute, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Zaragoza Faculty of Medicine, Zaragoza, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESHospital San Pedro · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during labor and delivery with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and using immunoglobulin G and M testing to correlate with maternal and perinatal outcomes. MAIN

methodsPregnant women admitted for labor and delivery at two Spanish hospitals were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR test and by detection of serum immunoglobulins G and M. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared in women with laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with those with negative tests. KEY

findingsBetween March 31st and September 30th, 2020, 1211 pregnant women were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prevalence of laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was 5.4% (n = 65), corresponding to (i) 22 ongoing infections at admission, including two with mild clinical symptoms and 20 asymptomatic women; (ii) 43 cases of previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure; (iii) and 1146 women who were negative for both SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serological test. None of the screened mothers required hospital admission for coronavirus disease before or after delivery, nor were any of the newborns admitted to the intensive care unit. All newborns from mothers with positive PCR on admission were PCR negative. There were no significant differences in maternal or perinatal outcomes among the three studied groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Ongoing or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection with asymptomatic or mild clinical symptoms detected during screening in pregnant women at labor and delivery do not have a higher rate of adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 Serological TestingDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSARS-CoV-2SpainYoung AdultImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MCoronavirus 2019COVID-19Labor and deliveryPolymerase chain reactionSARS-CoV-2Serum immunoglobulins

Identifiers

PMID33577855
PMCPMC7871853
OpenAlexW3128561363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.