Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33577791›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2021

Glaucoma Expert-Level Detection of Angle Closure in Goniophotographs With Convolutional Neural Networks: The Chinese American Eye Study.

Michael Chiang, Daniel Guth, Anmol A Pardeshi, Jasmeen Randhawa, Alice Shen, Meghan Shan, Justin Dredge, Annie Nguyen, Kimberly Gokoffski, Brandon J Wong and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Automated iridocorneal angle classification using a multimodal large language model.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael ChiangRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Daniel GuthDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Anmol A PardeshiRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Jasmeen RandhawaKeck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Alice ShenRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Meghan ShanRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Justin DredgeRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Annie NguyenRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Kimberly GokoffskiRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Brandon J WongRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Brian SongRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California.
Shan LinGlaucoma Center of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Rohit VarmaSouthern California Eye Institute, CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Benjamin Y XuRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern, California. Electronic address: benjamin.xu@med.usc.edu.

Funding

Chinese American Eye StudyU10EY017337 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VARMA, ROHIT · 2009 to 2013
$10.2M
Ophthalmic Therapeutics Engineering CoreP30EY029220 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Qifa Zhou · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
Development and Validation of Quantitative Anterior Segment OCT-based Methods to Evaluate Patients with Primary Angle Closure DiseaseK23EY029763 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI XU, BENJAMIN Y. · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY029763NEI NIH HHS P30 EY029220NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the performance of a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier and human graders in detecting angle closure in EyeCam (Clarity Medical Systems, Pleasanton, California, USA) goniophotographs.

designRetrospective cross-sectional study.

methodsSubjects from the Chinese American Eye Study underwent EyeCam goniophotography in 4 angle quadrants. A CNN classifier based on the ResNet-50 architecture was trained to detect angle closure, defined as inability to visualize the pigmented trabecular meshwork, using reference labels by a single experienced glaucoma specialist. The performance of the CNN classifier was assessed using an independent test dataset and reference labels by the single glaucoma specialist or a panel of 3 glaucoma specialists. This performance was compared to that of 9 human graders with a range of clinical experience. Outcome measures included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) metrics and Cohen kappa coefficients in the binary classification of open or closed angle.

resultsThe CNN classifier was developed using 29,706 open and 2,929 closed angle images. The independent test dataset was composed of 600 open and 400 closed angle images. The CNN classifier achieved excellent performance based on single-grader (AUC = 0.969) and consensus (AUC = 0.952) labels. The agreement between the CNN classifier and consensus labels (κ = 0.746) surpassed that of all non-reference human graders (κ = 0.578-0.702). Human grader agreement with consensus labels improved with clinical experience (P = 0.03).

conclusionA CNN classifier can effectively detect angle closure in goniophotographs with performance comparable to that of an experienced glaucoma specialist. This provides an automated method to support remote detection of patients at risk for primary angle closure glaucoma.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAgedAged, 80 and overAnterior Eye SegmentArea Under CurveAsianChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedExpert SystemsFemaleGlaucoma, Angle-ClosureGonioscopyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleAngle closureartificial intelligencegoniophotographygonioscopyprimary angle closure glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID33577791
PMCPMC8286291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.