Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33577580›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Candidate drugs for preventive treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A cross-sectional study.

Kampei Shimizu, Hirotoshi Imamura, Shoichi Tani, Hidemitsu Adachi, Chiaki Sakai, Akira Ishii, Hiroharu Kataoka, Susumu Miyamoto, Tomohiro Aoki, Nobuyuki Sakai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kampei ShimizuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4952-0608
Hirotoshi ImamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-7861
Shoichi TaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Hidemitsu AdachiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Chiaki SakaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Akira IshiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroharu KataokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Susumu MiyamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohiro AokiDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Research Institute, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuyuki SakaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3289-1210
Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeEstablishment of drug therapy to prevent rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is needed. Previous human and animal studies have gradually clarified candidate drugs for preventive treatment of IA rupture. However, because most of these candidates belong to classes of drugs frequently co-administered to prevent cardiovascular diseases, epidemiological studies evaluating these drugs simultaneously should be performed. Furthermore, because drugs included in the same class may have different effects in terms of disease prevention, drug-by-drug assessments are important for planning intervention trials. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study enrolling patients diagnosed with IAs between July 2011 and June 2019 at our institution. Patients were divided into ruptured or unruptured groups. The drugs investigated were selected according to evidence suggested by either human or animal studies. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of drug treatment with rupture status. We also performed drug-by-drug assessments of the association, including dose-response relationships, with rupture status.

resultsIn total, 310 patients with ruptured and 887 patients with unruptured IAs were included. Multivariate analysis revealed an inverse association of statins (odds ratio (OR), 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.77), calcium channel blockers (OR, 0.41; 95% CI 0.30-0.58), and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (OR, 0.67; 95% CI 0.48-0.93) with ruptured IAs. Moreover, inverse dose-response relationships with rupture status were observed for pitavastatin and rosuvastatin among statins, benidipine, cilnidipine, and amlodipine among calcium channel blockers, and valsartan, azilsartan, candesartan, and olmesartan among ARBs. Only non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were positively associated with ruptured IAs (OR, 3.24; 95% CI 1.71-6.13).

conclusionsThe present analysis suggests that several types of statins, calcium channel blockers, and ARBs are candidate drugs for preventive treatment of unruptured IAs.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsAneurysm, RupturedCross-Sectional StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID33577580
PMCPMC7880482
OpenAlexW3128178481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.