Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576998›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Quality Control in Diagnostic Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Microbiology.

Judith Kikhney, Annette Moter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Testing for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judith KikhneyBiofilmcenter, Institute for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Annette MoterBiofilmcenter, Institute for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. annette.moter@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This overview addresses fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a diagnostic microbiology setting with its associated problems and pitfalls and how to control them, but also the advantages and opportunities the method offers. This article focuses mainly on diagnostic FISH assays on tissue sections and on techniques and experiences in our laboratory. FISH in a routine diagnostic setting in microbiology requires strict quality control measures to ensure consistent high-quality and reliable assay results. Here, for the first time, we define quality control requirements for microbiological diagnostic FISH applications and discuss their impact and possible future developments of the FISH technique for infection diagnostics. We focus on diagnosis of biofilm-associated infections including infective endocarditis, oral biofilms, and device-associated infections as well as infections due to fastidious or yet uncultured microorganisms like Treponema spp., Tropheryma whipplei, Bartonella, Coxiella burnetii, or Brachyspira.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofilmsEndocarditis, BacterialFluorescenceIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicrobiologyQuality ControlBiofilmDiagnostic FISHFluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)MicrobiologyMolecular diagnosisPathogen identificationQuality control

Identifiers

PMID33576998
OpenAlexW3128055407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.