Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576996›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

FISH in Food Samples.

Rui Rocha, Carina Almeida, Nuno F Azevedo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rui RochaCISAS - Centre for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal. rru@ipvc.pt.
Carina AlmeidaINIAV - National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinarian, Rua dos Lagidos, Lugar da Madalena, Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal.
Nuno F AzevedoLEPABE - Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária · PTPolytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne diseases are a major global public health concern. The gold standard detection techniques, namely culture plating techniques, are nowadays considered inadequate for the modern food industry mainly due to the time requirements of this sector. As such, the adoption of faster detection methods to be routinely used in screening the protocols of foodborne pathogens is required. Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) methods have been described as a valid alternative to standard plating techniques and are compatible with the requirements of the food industry.Here, we give an overview of the methodological aspects to consider regarding sample preparation and sample analysis for pathogen detection in food matrices by FISH methodologies.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesFood ContaminationFood IndustryFood MicrobiologyIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceDetectionFoodborneMicroscopyPathogenPre-enrichment

Identifiers

PMID33576996
OpenAlexW3127699050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.