Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576942›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychology review2021

Decision-Making Competence in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of the Literature.

Fanny Gaubert, Hanna Chainay

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychology review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Aducanumab: Appropriate Use Recommendations Update.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fanny GaubertLaboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lyon 2, 5 avenue Pierre Mendès France, 69676, Bron, France. f.gaubert@univ-lyon2.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-6125
Hanna ChainayLaboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lyon 2, 5 avenue Pierre Mendès France, 69676, Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5754-033X
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making competence (DMC) appears to be influenced by the congruency between the characteristics of the individual, the task and the context. Indeed, the ability to make decisions seems to be highly sensitive to cognitive changes as observed, in particular, in the healthy elderly. Few studies have investigated these relations in pathological ageing. In this review, we focus on DMC in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the links its impairment could have with deficits in episodic memory, working memory, and executive functions. Decision-making under risk and under ambiguity appears to be impaired early in the progress of AD, with the deficit being greater during the later stages of the disease. In addition, some studies suggest that the impairment of DMC is exacerbated by deficits in other cognitive functions, in particular working memory and executive functions. This degradation in the ability to make decisions seriously affects the quality of life of patients and their relatives, since they frequently face important decisions, especially concerning healthcare, finance or accommodation. Thus, the growing incapacity to decide for themselves increases patients' and caregivers' stress and burden. The challenge for future studies is to determine how best to help patients and their families in the decisional process.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAgedCognitionDecision MakingExecutive FunctionHumansQuality of LifeAlzheimer’s diseaseDaily lifeDecision-making competenceDecision-making under ambiguityDecision-making under riskExecutive functionsWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID33576942
OpenAlexW3127975546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.