ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2021
Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Escalating Doses of PEGylated Exenatide (PB-119) in Healthy Volunteers.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03062774 (The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamics Study of Continuous Multiple Dose PB-119 Injection in Health Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamics Study of Continuous Multiple Dose PB-119 Injection in Health Volunteers
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of visepegenatide as an add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Opportunities and challenges of incretin-based hypoglycemic agents treating type 2 diabetes mellitus from the perspective of physiological disposition.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAt present, the deficiency of β-cell function is progressive in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exenatide cannot only control blood glucose well, but also promotes the regeneration and proliferation of islet β-cells and improves the function of β cells. However, it needs to be given twice a day, and there are many adverse reactions such as nausea. PEGylated exenatide (study code: PB-119) needs to be administered only once a week. The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an escalating dose regimen of subcutaneous PEGylated exenatide injections in healthy subjects.
methodsTwelve healthy young adult subjects in each group received once-weekly subcutaneous injections of 165 μg, 330 μg, and 660 μg PEGylated exenatide for 6 weeks. Plasma drug concentration was determined in venous blood collected across selected time points. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events, laboratory parameters, and electrocardiogram. Blood glucose, insulin, glucagon and C peptide were monitored at different time points to evaluate the pharmacodynamics of PEGylated exenatide.
resultsA total of 11, 10, and 12 subjects completed the study in 165 µg, 330 µg, and 660 µg dose groups, respectively. After 6 consecutive weeks of administration, the t
conclusionA once-weekly subcutaneous injection of 165 µg and 330 µg PEGylated exenatide is safe. No significant effects on blood glucose or pancreatic hormone levels were observed in the subjects within these dose groups. The pharmacokinetic parameters of PEGylated exenatide may be affected by immunogenicity. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (No. NCT03062774).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.