Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576863›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2021

[Status of palliative care education in Germany : A survey of medical faculties in 2018].

Lisa Ohlmeier, Alexandra Scherg, Benjamin Ilse, Frank Elsner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Palliative Care Education].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa OhlmeierKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Alexandra SchergEvangelisches Krankenhaus Wesel, Schermbecker Landstraße 88, 46485, Wesel, Deutschland.
Benjamin IlseKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
Frank ElsnerKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. felsner@ukaachen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the development in palliative care education in Germany, numerous surveys have been conducted since 2006. They showed differences of palliative care education between the faculties before and after the implementation of palliative care as a mandatory subject. The present study aims to document the status of palliative care education at German medical faculties in 2018. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing an online questionnaire with 19 questions, the structure, organization, content, and assessment of palliative care education of German medical faculties were assessed.

resultsOf the 37 participating faculties, 30 reported improvements in terms of structural aspects, e.g., there were more palliative care units and full professorships. Due to increasing opportunities for final year rotations and innovative, practical teaching, students can now deepen their knowledge, skills, and attitude in palliative care.

conclusionThis study showed clear progression in palliative care education. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement in terms of examination formats and professorships. Complementary surveys with students would be helpful to evaluate the education outcome.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCurriculumFaculty, MedicalGermanyHumansPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCurriculum/palliative careEducation, medical, undergraduateOnline surveyPain managementSymptom control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.