Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576859›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Automatic screening of tear meniscus from lacrimal duct obstructions using anterior segment optical coherence tomography images by deep learning.

Hitoshi Imamura, Hitoshi Tabuchi, Daisuke Nagasato, Hiroki Masumoto, Hiroaki Baba, Hiroki Furukawa, Sachiko Maruoka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epiphora: A Structured Diagnostic Approach for the Otolaryngologist.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hitoshi ImamuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji City, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.
Hitoshi TabuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji City, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.
Daisuke NagasatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji City, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan. d.nagasato@tsukazaki-eye.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3956-9352
Hiroki MasumotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji City, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.
Hiroaki BabaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji City, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.
Hiroki FurukawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji City, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.
Sachiko MaruokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji City, Hyogo, 671-1227, Japan.
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe assessed the ability of deep learning (DL) models to distinguish between tear meniscus of lacrimal duct obstruction (LDO) patients and normal subjects using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) images.

methodsThe study included 117 ASOCT images (19 men and 98 women; mean age, 66.6 ± 13.6 years) from 101 LDO patients and 113 ASOCT images (29 men and 84 women; mean age, 38.3 ± 19.9 years) from 71 normal subjects. We trained to construct 9 single and 502 ensemble DL models with 9 different network structures, and calculated the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity to compare the distinguishing abilities of these single and ensemble DL models.

resultsFor the highest single DL model (DenseNet169), the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for distinguishing LDO were 0.778, 64.6%, and 72.1%, respectively. For the highest ensemble DL model (VGG16, ResNet50, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, InceptionResNetV2, InceptionV3, and Xception), the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for distinguishing LDO were 0.824, 84.8%, and 58.8%, respectively. The heat maps indicated that these DL models placed their focus on the tear meniscus region of the ASOCT images.

conclusionThe combination of DL and ASOCT images could distinguish between tear meniscus of LDO patients and normal subjects with a high level of accuracy. These results suggest that DL might be useful for automatic screening of patients for LDO.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLacrimal Duct ObstructionMeniscusAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleTearsTomography, Optical CoherenceAnterior segment optical coherence tomography imageArea under the curveDeep learningLacrimal duct obstructionTear meniscus

Identifiers

PMID33576859
OpenAlexW3126582967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.