Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576851›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2021

Resting-state networks in the course of aging-differential insights from studies across the lifespan vs. amongst the old.

C Jockwitz, S Caspers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C JockwitzInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany. c.jockwitz@fz-juelich.de.
S CaspersInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) has widely been used to examine reorganization of functional brain networks during normal aging. The extraction of generalizable age trends, however, is hampered by differences in methodological approaches, study designs and sample characteristics. Distinct age ranges of study samples thereby represent an important aspect between studies especially due to the increase in inter-individual variability over the lifespan. The current review focuses on comparing age-related differences in RSFC in the course of the whole adult lifespan versus later decades of life. We summarize and compare studies assessing age-related differences in within- and between-network RSFC of major resting-state brain networks. Differential effects of the factor age on resting-state networks can be identified when comparing studies focusing on younger versus older adults with studies investigating effects within the older adult population. These differential effects pertain to higher order and primary processing resting-state networks to a varying extent. Especially during later decades of life, other factors beyond age might come into play to understand the high inter-individual variability in RSFC.

Indexed as

AgingBrainBrain WavesConnectomeHumansAgingFunctional connectivityLifespanOlder adultsResting state

Identifiers

PMID33576851
PMCPMC8076139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.