Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576791›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021

Diagnostic criteria for early hip osteoarthritis: first steps, based on the CHECK study.

Jos Runhaar, Ömer Özbulut, Margreet Kloppenburg, Maarten Boers, Johannes W J Bijlsma, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, CREDO expert group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association between hip pain and radiographic hip osteoarthritis in primary care: the CHECK cohort.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jos RunhaarDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam.ORCID 0000-0002-6293-6707
Ömer ÖzbulutDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
Margreet KloppenburgDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Maarten BoersDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam.
Johannes W J BijlsmaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
Sita M A Bierma-ZeinstraDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
CREDO expert group
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Dutch Arthritis Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough there is a general focus on early diagnosis and treatment of hip OA, there are no validated diagnostic criteria for early-stage hip OA. The current study aimed to take the first steps in developing diagnostic criteria for early-stage hip OA, using factors obtained through history taking, physical examination, radiography and blood testing at the first consultation in individuals presenting with hip pain, suspicious for hip OA, in primary care.

methodsData of the 543 individuals with 735 symptomatic hips at baseline who had any follow-up data available from the prospective CHECK cohort study were used. A group of 26 clinical experts [general practitioners (GPs), rheumatologists and orthopaedic surgeons] evaluated standardized clinical assessment forms of all subjects on the presence of clinically relevant hip OA 5-10 years after baseline. Using the expert-based diagnoses as reference standard, a backward selection method was used to create predictive models based on pre-defined baseline factors from history taking, physical examination, radiography and blood testing.

resultsPrevalence of clinically relevant hip OA during follow-up was 22%. Created models contained four to eight baseline factors (mainly WOMAC pain items, painful/restricted movements and radiographic features) and obtained area under the curve between 0.62 (0.002) and 0.71 (0.002).

conclusionBased on clinical and radiographic features of hip OA obtained at first consultation at a GP for pain/stiffness of the hip, the prediction of clinically relevant hip OA within 5-10 years was 'poor' to 'fair'.

Indexed as

FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularReference Standardsdiagnostic criteriaearly diagnosisexpert diagnosiship osteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID33576791
PMCPMC8566292
OpenAlexW3126747815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.