Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33576585›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2021

Effects of intraoperative blood loss during liver resection on patients’ outcome: a single- center experience

Muhammed Selim Bodur, Kadir Tomas, Serdar Topaloğlu, Şükrü Oğuz, Hakan Küçükaslan, Davut Dohman, Erdem Karabulut, Adnan Çalık

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multidisciplinary Approach to Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammed Selim BodurDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8168-623x
Kadir TomasDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4129-5725
Serdar TopaloğluDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4625-5116
Şükrü OğuzDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-1354-8898
Hakan KüçükaslanDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1118-7301
Davut DohmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5884-6277
Erdem KarabulutDepartment of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7811-8215
Adnan ÇalıkDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0853-9169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Operative bleeding is one of the major determinants of outcome in liver surgery. This study aimed to describe the impact of intraoperative blood loss on the postoperative course of liver resection (LR). Materials and methods: The data of 257 patients who were treated with LR between January 2007 and October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. LRs were performed via intermittent portal triad clamping (PTC) under low central venous pressure. Results: LRs were performed for 67.7% of patients with a malignant disease and 32.3% of patients with a benign disease. Major LR was performed in 89 patients (34.6%). The mean PTC period was 20.32 min (±13.7). The median intraoperative bleeding amount was 200 mL (5–3500 mL), the 30-day mortality rate was 4.3%, and the morbidity rate was 31.9%. The hospital stay (p = 0.002), morbidity (p = 0.009), and 30-day mortality (p = 0.041) of patients with a bleeding amount of more than 500 mL significantly increased. Conclusion: Surgeons should consider the adverse effects of intraoperative bleeding during liver resection on patients’ outcome. Favorable outcomes would be obtained with diligent postoperative care.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalLiver NeoplasmsCentral Venous PressureHepatectomyHumansLiverRetrospective StudieshemostasisLiver surgerylow central venous pressureoperative bleedingportal triad clamping

Identifiers

PMID33576585
PMCPMC8283449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.