Trial reportIndian journal of pediatrics2021
Intravenous Methylprednisolone Versus Oral Prednisolone for West Syndrome: A Randomized Open-Label Trial.
Trial report in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03876444 (Intravenous Methylprednisolone Versus High Dose Oral Prednisolone for the Treatment of Infantile Spasms), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Methylprednisolone Versus High Dose Oral Prednisolone for the Treatment of Infantile Spasms: a Randomized Open-labelled Trial
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hormonal Therapy for Infantile Spasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- PersADE: a database of personalized adverse drug events and their underlying molecular mechanisms.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- One Size Does Not Fit All: Novel Individualized Use of Dexamethasone in Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- First-choice hormonal therapies for children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome in South Asia: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Epilepsia open · 2024Review
- Brazilian experts' consensus on the treatment of infantile epileptic spasm syndrome in infants.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2023Article
- The landscape of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome in South Asia: peculiarities, challenges, and way forward.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2023Review
- Epilepsy and Cognitive Impairment in Childhood and Adolescence: A Mini-Review.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Review
- Danggui Sini decoction treatment of refractory allergic cutaneous vasculitis: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Safety of Intravenous Methylprednisolone in Refractory and Severe Pediatric Uveitis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- What Matters the Most for Hormonal Therapy in West Syndrome: Drug, Dosage, or Duration?Indian journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Methylprednisolone Therapy in Comparison With Intramuscular Adrenocorticotropic Hormone and Oral Prednisolone in Children With Infantile Spasms.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Finding the Best: Corticosteroids for the Treatment of West Syndrome.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
- Steroids in Infantile Spasms Syndrome: Another Trial, Another Drug, Another Dose, What's Next?Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) with oral prednisolone (OP) for the treatment of West syndrome.
methodsIn this randomized, open-label trial, children aged 2 to 30 mo presenting with epileptic spasms with hypsarrhythmia or its variants on EEG were randomized to receive either IVMP (30 mg/kg/d for 3 d followed by oral prednisolone taper) or OP (4 mg/kg/d for two weeks followed by taper). The primary outcome measure was spasms cessation on day 14. Secondary outcomes included time to response, electroclinical remission at 2 and 6 wk, and frequency of adverse effects. ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03876444).
resultsSixty children were enrolled; 31 in the IVMP and 29 in the OP arm. Proportion of children achieving spasms cessation at day 14 was similar in both groups (54.8% versus 68.9%, p = 0.26). Time to achieve remission was lower in the IVMP group (mean 5.4 ± 0.9 versus 9.5 ± 2.6 d, p < 0.0001). Electroclinical remission at 2 wk was similar in both groups (51.6% versus 44.8%, p = 0.59) but lower at 6 wk in the IVMP group (45.2% versus 75.9%, p < 0.015). Adverse effects like sleep disturbance, irritability and hypertension were more common in IVMP group whereas weight gain was more common in the OP group.
conclusionsThere was no significant difference in spasms cessation between the groups on day 14 although remission was higher at 6 wk in OP group. Our study suggests that OP was better than IVMP in efficacy and sustained remission with fewer adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.