Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575933›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Patient-specific plate for navigation and fixation of the distal radius: a case series.

Johannes G G Dobbe, Abbas Peymani, Hendrika A L Roos, Maikel Beerens, Geert J Streekstra, Simon D Strackee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ESTES recommendations regarding distal radius fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 3D-assisted corrective osteotomies of the distal radius: a comparison of pre-contoured conventional implants versus patient-specific implants.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes G G DobbeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room No L0-113-3, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.g.dobbe@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-6471
Abbas PeymaniDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-0469
Hendrika A L RoosDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maikel BeerensXilloc Medical, Urmonderbaan 22, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Geert J StreekstraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room No L0-113-3, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-7633
Simon D StrackeeDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-5559
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Eurostars () ID 9809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCorrective osteotomy of a malunited distal radius conventionally relies on 2D imaging techniques for alignment planning and evaluation. However, this approach results in suboptimal bone repositioning, which is associated with poor patient outcomes. In this case series, we evaluate the use of novel patient-specific plates (PSPs), which feature navigation and fixation of bone segments as preoperatively planned in 3D.

methodsTen participants with distal radius malunion underwent CT scans for preoperative alignment planning. Patient-specific guides and plates were designed, 3D-printed, and sterilized for use in corrective surgery of the distal radius. Pre- and postoperative results were compared in regard to clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes.

resultsThe application of a PSP was successful in 7 of the 10 cases. After treatment, the residual alignment error was reduced by approximately 50% compared with conventional treatment. The use of PSPs reduced pain significantly. Pre- and postoperative results were pooled and demonstrated significant correlations between: (1) pain and malpositioning, (2) the range of pro- and supination motion, the MHOQ score, the EQ-5D-5L score and dorsovolar angulation, and (3) MHOQ score and proximodistal translation.

conclusionThe correlation between malalignment and MHOQ score, EQ-5D-5L score, pain, and range of motion shows that alignment should be restored as well as possible. Compared to the conventional approach, which relies on 2D imaging techniques, corrective osteotomy based on 3D preoperative planning and intraoperative fixation with a PSP has been shown to improve bone alignment and reduce pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBone and BonesCarpal BonesFemaleFractures, MalunitedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedOsteotomyPatient PositioningRadiographyRadiusRadius Fractures3D planningComputer-assisted surgeryCorrective osteotomyCustom treatmentMalunion

Identifiers

PMID33575933
PMCPMC7946677
OpenAlexW3126584042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.