Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575845›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2021

Technological Scenario for Masks in Patent Database During Covid-19 Pandemic.

Tatianny de Araújo Andrade, José Adão Carvalho Nascimento Junior, Anamaria Mendonça Santos, Lysandro Pinto Borges, Lucindo José Quintans-Júnior, Cristiani Isabel Banderó Walker, Luiza Abrahão Frank, Mairim Russo Serafini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Speech Impaired by Half Masks Used for the Respiratory Tract Protection.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatianny de Araújo AndradeDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, 49100-000, Brazil. tatianny_aa@hotmail.com.
José Adão Carvalho Nascimento JuniorDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, 49100-000, Brazil.
Anamaria Mendonça SantosDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, 49100-000, Brazil.
Lysandro Pinto BorgesDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, 49100-000, Brazil.
Lucindo José Quintans-JúniorDepartment of Physiology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Cristiani Isabel Banderó WalkerDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, 49100-000, Brazil.
Luiza Abrahão FrankDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5918-1008
Mairim Russo SerafiniDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, 49100-000, Brazil. maiserafini@hotmail.com.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since January 2020, the World Health Organization announces COVID-19 outbreak a case of public health emergency of international interest, and declaring it a pandemic on March. Due to the high transmission of this disease, rate precautions have been implemented, such as the use of masks by the population, personal protective equipment (PPE), and safety protocols, mainly to health workers. Thus, we performed a patent review to evaluate the current patents related to the protective mask. The review was carried out in the patent database in the period of May 2019 to May 2020. After the process of screening and eligibility, 563 patents were selected for our analysis according to the aim of the study which used masks such as a PPE against dust particles and pathogens, mostly when it is about airborne transmission, such as viruses and bacteria. Here, an overview of the main materials used in the mask manufacturing and their efficiency was described. The results of the review showed that most of the masks used cotton, nylon, silver fiber fabrics, among others as fabrics to develop the masks. It also makes an analysis of masks composed of nanotechnology which provide high filtration efficiency. Moreover, the review also brought possibilities of masking the population, which already have been done in countries such as China and Korea and ways of sterilization for reuse of PPE during COVID-19 outbreak. Thus, this review can further researchers in the developing of masks to decrease the spread of a pandemic disease. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

COVID-19MasksPandemicsPatientsPersonal Protective EquipmentDatabases, FactualHumanscoronavirusCOVID-19masksnanotechnologyvirus

Identifiers

PMID33575845
PMCPMC7877530
OpenAlexW3128063676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.