ArticleHeart and vessels2021
Major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality after catheter ablation in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: The Fushimi AF Registry.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Freedom from atrial arrhythmia and other clinical outcomes at 5 years and beyond after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of ablation therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Review
- HHeart and vessels · 2023Article
- Impact of nocturnal hypoxemia on the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.Heart and vessels · 2022Article
- The fate of patients after failed epicardial ablation of atrial fibrillation.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of catheter ablation (CA) on the long-term clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) are unclear due to limited cohort investigations.
methodsThe Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of patients with AF in Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan. Of 4465 patients enrolled between March 2011 and July 2019, analyses were performed on 2639 patients (492 patients who underwent CA and 2147 patients who received standard rhythm- and/or rate-control drug therapy at baseline). We compared the baseline characteristics and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: the composite of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism), and all-cause mortality during the follow-up using propensity score matching.
resultsAfter entering 20 covariates in the current matching analysis, 342 patients who underwent CA and 342 matched patients who received drug therapy, with a median follow-up of 1865 days, were included. The patients who underwent CA were significantly associated with lower incidence of MACE (hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.36-0.86; P = 0.0077), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.75; P = 0.0016).
conclusionCA was associated with lower incidences of MACE and all-cause mortality for patients with AF as compared with those who received drug therapy. The most common event of MACE in patients who underwent CA was heart failure hospitalization. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: UMIN000005834.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33575844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.