ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021
Impact of depression on adherence to lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychological Distress in Patients Treated for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile continued lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) treatment could improve survival outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM), the association of depression on the adherence to Rd regimen in myeloma patients has never been studied even though depression is a common symptom among MM patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of depression prior to Rd treatment on adherence to the treatment among patients with MM.
methodsThis multicenter cohort study was conducted from January 2015 to October 2018 at five tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients who completed fewer than 4 cycles, 4-11 cycles, and more than 12 cycles were categorized as the poor adherence group (PAG), moderate adherence group (MAG), and good adherence group (GAG), respectively.
resultsAmong141 patients, 41.8% of them had depression before beginning Rd treatment and 46% of participants were in the GAG. Compared with patients in the GAG (30.3%), patients in the PAG were more likely to have depression at baseline (90.0%) and had the higher distress scores (6.35 vs. 4.28, P < 0.01). Presence of depression prior to Rd treatment was significantly associated with poor adherence (IRR = 6.67, 95% CI = 1.45, 30.61) after adjusting for age, sex, education, ECOG, ISS stage, number of previous treatments, and disease status prior to Rd treatment.
conclusionsPatients with depression had a substantially high risk of poor adherence compared to patients without depression. Given that Rd treatment is mainly offered by outpatient clinics, active interventions to reduce depression should be considered for MM patients prior to Rd treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.