Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575790›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2021

To stop or not to stop 'culture': determining the essential behavior of the government, church and public in fighting against COVID-19.

Dalmacito A Cordero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Into the "New Normal": The Ethical and Analytical Challenge Facing Public Health Post-COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dalmacito A CorderoTheology and Religious Education Department, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0001-8062-1242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Culture is a way of life. A recent correspondence emphasizes that it is a contributory factor in combatting the COVID-19 pandemic, and this must be considered by each government around the world. However, I argue that various elements in culture do not need to stop or else it will create public outrage. I therefore propose a win-win solution for both parties with the inclusion of the church that can serve as a framework for the sake of public health. It is primarily based on a kind of behavior that is needed to be embodied by the involved groups-'supportive' government, 'creative' church and an 'adaptive' public. These essential behaviors of all groups are possible to embody for a successful implementation of public health.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsGovernmentHumansPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33575790
PMCPMC7928729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.