ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2020
Global Trends of Usage of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Projections for the Next Decade.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electron transport reactions of cyanobacterial photosynthesis and state-of-the-art in vivo measurement techniques.Plant physiology · 2026Review
- Harnessing the untapped genetic diversity of local landraces: omics technologies as a gateway to horticultural breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Volumetric Deep Learning-Based Precision Phenotyping of Gene-Edited Tomato for Vertical Farming.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Green manure can be an auxiliary factor against dynamic photoinhibition inPhotosynthetica · 2025Article
- Chlorophyll fluorometry in evaluating photosynthetic performance: key limitations, possibilities, perspectives and alternatives.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022Review
- Advances in field-based high-throughput photosynthetic phenotyping.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Review
- Two-Species Forests at the Treeline of Siberian Mountains: An Ecophysiological Perspective under Climate Change.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chlorophyll fluorescence is the most widely used set of techniques to probe photosynthesis and plant stress. Its great versatility has given rise to different routine methods to study plants and algae. The three main technical platforms are pulse amplitude modulation (PAM), fast rise of chlorophyll fluorescence, and fast repetition rate. Solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) has also gained interest in the last few years. Works have compared their advantages and their underlying theory, with many arguments advanced as to which method is the most accurate and useful. To date, no data has assessed the exact magnitude of popularity and influence for each methodology. In this work, we have taken the bibliometrics of the past decade for each of the four platforms, have evaluated the public scientific opinion toward each method, and possibly identified a geographical bias. We used various metrics to assess influence and popularity for the four routine platforms compared in this study and found that, overall, PAM currently has the highest values, although the more recent SIF has increased in popularity rapidly during the last decade. This indicates that PAM is currently one of the fundamental tools in chlorophyll fluorescence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.