Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575654›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

Increased yields of duplex sequencing data by a series of quality control tools.

Gundula Povysil, Monika Heinzl, Renato Salazar, Nicholas Stoler, Anton Nekrutenko, Irene Tiemann-Boege

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gundula PovysilInstitute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University, 4020 Linz, Austria.
Monika HeinzlInstitute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University, 4020 Linz, Austria.
Renato SalazarInstitute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University, 4020 Linz, Austria.
Nicholas StolerGraduate Program in Bioinformatics and Genomics, The Huck Institutes for Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Anton NekrutenkoGraduate Program in Bioinformatics and Genomics, The Huck Institutes for Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5987-8032
Irene Tiemann-BoegeInstitute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University, 4020 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3621-7020
Johannes Kepler University of Linz · ATPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duplex sequencing is currently the most reliable method to identify ultra-low frequency DNA variants by grouping sequence reads derived from the same DNA molecule into families with information on the forward and reverse strand. However, only a small proportion of reads are assembled into duplex consensus sequences (DCS), and reads with potentially valuable information are discarded at different steps of the bioinformatics pipeline, especially reads without a family. We developed a bioinformatics toolset that analyses the tag and family composition with the purpose to understand data loss and implement modifications to maximize the data output for the variant calling. Specifically, our tools show that tags contain polymerase chain reaction and sequencing errors that contribute to data loss and lower DCS yields. Our tools also identified chimeras, which likely reflect barcode collisions. Finally, we also developed a tool that re-examines variant calls from raw reads and provides different summary data that categorizes the confidence level of a variant call by a tier-based system. With this tool, we can include reads without a family and check the reliability of the call, that increases substantially the sequencing depth for variant calling, a particular important advantage for low-input samples or low-coverage regions.

Identifiers

PMID33575654
PMCPMC7872198
OpenAlexW3127803840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.