Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575651›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

Rapid discovery of novel prophages using biological feature engineering and machine learning.

Kimmo Sirén, Andrew Millard, Bent Petersen, M Thomas P Gilbert, Martha R J Clokie, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization of humanMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fully resolved genome assembly of aMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kimmo SirénSection for Evolutionary Genomics, The GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen,1353 Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4890-7552
Andrew MillardDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3895-2854
Bent PetersenSection for Evolutionary Genomics, The GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen,1353 Denmark.
M Thomas P GilbertSection for Evolutionary Genomics, The GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen,1353 Denmark.
Martha R J ClokieDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH Leicester, UK.
Thomas Sicheritz-PonténSection for Evolutionary Genomics, The GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen,1353 Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophages are phages that are integrated into bacterial genomes and which are key to understanding many aspects of bacterial biology. Their extreme diversity means they are challenging to detect using sequence similarity, yet this remains the paradigm and thus many phages remain unidentified. We present a novel, fast and generalizing machine learning method based on feature space to facilitate novel prophage discovery. To validate the approach, we reanalyzed publicly available marine viromes and single-cell genomes using our feature-based approaches and found consistently more phages than were detected using current state-of-the-art tools while being notably faster. This demonstrates that our approach significantly enhances bacteriophage discovery and thus provides a new starting point for exploring new biologies.

Identifiers

PMID33575651
PMCPMC7787355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.