Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575414›Full record

ArticleAIMS public health2021

Exploring health care professionals' and women's perspectives on the barriers to maternal health services: a qualitative study in Eku Town of Delta State, Nigeria.

Peter Oyovwe, Gillian Woolhead

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIMS public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter OyovweDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.
Gillian WoolheadDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uptake of maternal health services (MHS) have been shown to improve maternal health outcomes. In Nigeria, the maternal outcomes are classified among the poorest worldwide, despite the provision of free MHS to all pregnant women by many Nigerian state governments. The work was aimed at exploring the barriers to the uptake of MHS, from the perspectives of both women and health care professionals (HCP) in Eku Town of Delta State Nigeria, in order to gain a better understanding on views of MHS, and to guide future interventions, effective programs and policy strategies. Using an interpretivist and social constructivist epistemology approach, a qualitative study using 13 in-depth interviews were conducted. Seven women and six HCPs were recruited using purposive and snowballing sampling methods. Thematic content analysis was applied to the data. Three themes emerged. (1) Perspectives to free MHS. The majority of women preferred non-skilled Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) over the hospital heath service, as TBAs were viewed as more caring; with orthodox practice not being socially, culturally and religiously friendly. (2) Barriers to utilization: HCPs saw the barriers to hospital MHS as misconceptions by the women; the women mentioned the negative attitude of the HCPs and deficits in the free MHS scheme. (3) Enhancing utilization: HCPs stated that improved uptake of MHS required synergy between the community, government/hospital management through awareness, cultural/religious sensitivity, and HCP/TBA training. For the women, a change of HCPs hostile attitude and provision of more conducive hospital environment was required. There are a number of supply and demand factors that influence HCPs and women's perspectives of the uptake of MHS. Interventions and policies need to address both factors with the aim of improving the access and uptake of MHS in Nigeria.

Indexed as

barriershealth workersmaternal health servicesperspectivesqualitativewomen

Identifiers

PMID33575414
PMCPMC7870383
OpenAlexW3128237843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.