ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2020
Professional responsibility-acquiring process among bachelor degree nursing students: A grounded theory study.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of student professional responsibilities training in the process of clinical education in nursing students.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The relationship between professional self-concept and responsibility with nursing students' clinical performance of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- The effect of educational program based on the clinical practice protocol on treatment adherence, self-efficacy and quality of life of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Exploring the Impacts of Caring for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients on Nurses: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProfessional responsibility-acquiring process among bachelor degree nursing students is important for their current and future performance and educational and health-care system, but this process has not been explored in the literature. The aim of the current study is to explore the process of acquiring professional responsibility among bachelor degree nursing students. METHODOLOGY: The study design was based on grounded theory (Corbin and Strauss 2015). Purposive and theoretical sampling led to the inclusion of 18 individual interviews and a focus group interview with bachelor degree nursing students, their instructors, and key informants in a nursing school and university, an educational hospital, and a health comprehensive service center in Tehran in 2019-2020.
resultsAfter data analysis, 6 categories, 17 primary categories, 64 subcategories, and 1747 initial codes were extracted. Trying to optimal use of the educational period was the main category of this study and its primary categories were responsible learning and performance management strategies, there were facilitators and inhibitors categories for applying these strategies. Personal, educational, and professional context factors were primary categories that may lead to the main concern (uncertain productivity of the educational period) with regard to acquiring professional responsibility. Protection of the students and others versus irresponsibility was consequence category of this process.
conclusionKnowing the process of acquiring professional responsibility among bachelor degree nursing students can be used to facilitate the formation, promotion, and evaluation of professional responsible behaviors. Further researches in these areas are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.