Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575350›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2021

Intratumoral STING Agonist Injection Combined with Irreversible Electroporation Delays Tumor Growth in a Model of Hepatocarcinoma.

Aritz Lasarte-Cia, Teresa Lozano, David Cano, Celia Martín-Otal, Flor Navarro, Marta Gorraiz, Noelia Casares, Isabel Vivas, Juan José Lasarte

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Harnessing innate immune pathways for therapeutic advancement in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aritz Lasarte-CiaImmunology and Immunotherapy Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008 IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4758-7542
Teresa LozanoImmunology and Immunotherapy Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008 IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7122-5475
David CanoDepartment of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4960-0261
Celia Martín-OtalImmunology and Immunotherapy Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008 IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5442-4496
Flor NavarroImmunology and Immunotherapy Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008 IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5250-8437
Marta GorraizImmunology and Immunotherapy Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008 IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Noelia CasaresImmunology and Immunotherapy Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008 IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3817-6434
Isabel VivasDepartment of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-0753
Juan José LasarteImmunology and Immunotherapy Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, 31008 IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1641-3881
Universidad de Navarra · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimIrreversible electroporation (IRE) showed promising results for small-size tumors and very early cancers. However, further development is needed to evolve this procedure into a more efficient ablation technique for long-term control of tumor growth. In this work, we show that it is possible to increase the antitumor efficiency of IRE by simmultaneously injecting c-di-GMP, a STING agonist, intratumorally. MATERIALS AND

methodsIntratumoral administration of c-di-GMP simultaneously to IRE was evaluated in murine models of melanona (B16.OVA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (PM299L).

resultsThe combined therapy increased the number of tumor-infiltrating IFN-

conclusionThese results can lead to the development of a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cancer patients refractory to other therapies.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesAnimalsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell LineCombined Modality TherapyCyclic GMPElectroporationFemaleLiver NeoplasmsLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSTING Proteinbis(3',5')-cyclic diguanylic acidCyclic GMPMembrane ProteinsSting1 protein, mouseSTING Protein

Identifiers

PMID33575350
PMCPMC7857890
OpenAlexW3125704052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.