Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575223›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020

Cutaneous

Shree Harsha Vijaya Chandra, Ramasamy Srinivas, Thomas L Dawson, John E Common

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused byExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shree Harsha Vijaya ChandraSkin Research Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Ramasamy SrinivasSkin Research Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Thomas L DawsonSkin Research Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
John E CommonSkin Research Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin microbial community is a multifunctional ecosystem aiding prevention of infections from transient pathogens, maintenance of host immune homeostasis, and skin health. A better understanding of the complex milieu of microbe-microbe and host-microbe interactions will be required to define the ecosystem's optimal function and enable rational design of microbiome targeted interventions.

Indexed as

MalasseziaPsoriasisEcosystemHumansSkinSymbiosiscommensalhost and diseaseimmunityMalasseziamultikingdommutualistpathogenskin

Identifiers

PMID33575223
PMCPMC7870721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.