Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575139›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Cisplatin/5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) Versus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Chemoradiotherapy as Definitive or Pre-Operative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.

Cole Steber, Ryan T Hughes, Emory R McTyre, Michael Soike, Michael Farris, Beverly J Levine, Boris Pasche, Edward Levine, Arthur W Blackstock

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cole SteberRadiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Ryan T HughesRadiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Emory R McTyreRadiation Oncology, Prisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, USA.
Michael SoikeRadiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Michael FarrisRadiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Beverly J LevineEpidemiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Boris PascheHematology and Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Edward LevineSurgery Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Arthur W BlackstockRadiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USPrisma Health · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

PET IN MULTIMODALITY THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCERR21CA089410 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEVINE, EDWARD A · 2001 to 2002
$255k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA089410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To determine the efficacy and toxicity of two standard chemotherapy regimens used concurrent with radiation for the treatment of esophageal cancer: cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and carboplatin/paclitaxel. Materials and methods We prospectively reviewed records of 364 patients with histologically confirmed stage I to IVA esophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with or without resection. All patients received surgical evaluation and imaging at presentation as well as following completion of their course of CRT. Treatment and prognostic variables were compared across the two chemotherapy regimens. Results We identified 261 patients treated with concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 133) or cisplatin/5-FU (n = 128). Weight loss during CRT was lower in patients receiving carboplatin/paclitaxel (median: 7.0 pounds; 4.1% body weight) vs. cisplatin/5-FU (median: 11.0 pounds; 6.5% body weight) (p < 0.01). In 117 patients receiving trimodality therapy, post-operative death rates within one month of resection were similar. Pathologic complete response was better with carboplatin/paclitaxel vs. cisplatin/5-FU, 29.6% vs. 21.8% (p = 0.03), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, there was no association between chemotherapy regimen and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), though there was a trend toward improved OS with carboplatin/paclitaxel with a HR = 0.75 (p = 0.08). Further analysis revealed that trimodality therapy and stage were predictors for improved OS and PFS while female gender and grade predicted for improved PFS. Conclusions Carboplatin/paclitaxel was associated with decreased weight loss and improved pathologic response for trimodality patients when compared to cisplatin/5-FU. We observed no differences in OS, PFS, or post-operative death by chemotherapy regimen for both the entire cohort and trimodality patients.

Indexed as

carboplatin/paclitaxelchemotherapycisplatin/5-fudefinitive chemoradiationesophageal cancerlocally advanced esophageal cancerradiation therapytrimodality therapy

Identifiers

PMID33575139
PMCPMC7870131
OpenAlexW3120535276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.