Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33575065›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology

Utilizing a Palliative Care Screening Tool in Patients With Glioblastoma.

Jung Young Kim, Katherine B Peters, James E Herndon, Mary Lou Affronti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Palliative care in glioblastoma patients: a systematic review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Palliative Care in Neuro-oncology: an Update.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  7. A retrospective chart review to identify the involvement of palliative care with glioblastoma multiforme patients.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  8. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jung Young KimThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Katherine B PetersThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
James E HerndonDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Mary Lou AffrontiThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with glioblastoma have poor overall survival and experience significant burden from neurologic decline and adverse treatment effects. Despite the well-known benefits of early palliative care integration with oncology care, utilization of palliative care is low. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project is to investigate the feasibility, value, and effectiveness of using an adapted palliative care screening tool to improve outpatient palliative care screening and referral of glioblastoma patients. This QI project was conducted over a 10-week period. A glioma palliative care screening tool was developed and integrated into outpatient visits. Providers were required to use the screening tool during each patient visit. Patients 18 years or older who were diagnosed with a World Health Organization grade IV glioma and returning to the neuro-oncology clinic for a brain MRI evaluation were targeted. Screening, palliative care discussion, and referral rates were evaluated. Among 530 eligible patients who returned to the clinic over a 10-week period, the tool was available for 433 patients. Fifty-six percent (n = 294/530) of the patients were screened. Nine percent (n = 27) of screened patients were identified as candidates for a palliative care referral (score ≥ 5 on the screening tool). Of these 27 patients, the proportion of patients who had a palliative care discussion was 63% (n = 17). Overall, 71% (n = 12) of patients who had a palliative care discussion were referred to a palliative care provider. Integrating a glioma palliative care screening tool with outpatient visits can draw attention to palliative care needs and lead to a referral to palliative care.

Identifiers

PMID33575065
PMCPMC7646633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.