Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33574906›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021

Chu-Qiao Sheng, Chun-Feng Yang, Yu Ao, Zhi-Yue Zhao, Yu-Mei Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Machine learning-based prediction of severeTranslational pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Case Report: RefractoryFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. [Risk factors for embolism in children with refractoryZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Risk factors for delayed radiographic resolution in children with refractoryThe Journal of international medical research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chu-Qiao ShengDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
Chun-Feng YangDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
Yu AoDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
Zhi-Yue ZhaoDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
Yu-Mei LiDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China.
First Hospital of Jilin University · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma is one of the most common pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia in pediatric patients. In recent years, the number of refractory or severe cases with drug resistance has been gradually increasing and cases that developed embolism after

Indexed as

computed tomographic pulmonary angiographymycoplasma pneumoniapediatric patientspulmonary embolismrefractory mycoplasma pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID33574906
PMCPMC7818525
OpenAlexW3120863063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.