ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2021
Animal Experiment of a Novel Neurointerventional Surgical Robotic System with Master-Slave Mode.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical validation and literature review of robot-assisted cerebral angiography.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- Robotic Systems in Cardiovascular Interventions: Evolving Platforms and the Path Forward.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to inspect and improve the system performance of the neuro-interventional surgical robot and its effectiveness and safety in clinical applications, we conducted ten animal experiments using this robotic system. Cerebral angiography was performed on ten experimental animals, and various mechanical performance indicators, operating time, X-ray radiation dosage to the experimental animals and the experimenter, and arterial damage in the experimental animals were recorded when the robotic system completed cerebral angiography. The results show that the robotic system can successfully complete the cerebral angiography surgery, and the mechanical performance is up to standard. The operating time is almost the same as the physician's operating time. And the mean X-ray radiation dosage received by the experimental animals and experimenter was 0.893 Gy and 0.0859 mSv, respectively. There were no complications associated with damage to the vascular endothelium. The robotic system can basically complete the relevant assessment indicators, and its system performance, effectiveness, and safety in clinical applications meet the standards, basically meeting the requirements of clinical applications of neurointerventional surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.