ArticleJournal of experimental pharmacology2021
Antimalarial Activity of Methanolic Extracts and Solvent Fractions of
Article in Journal of experimental pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiplasmodial Screening of Phikud Navakot Formulation and In Vivo Evaluation, Toxicity, and Phytochemical Profiling of the PotentScientifica · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Antiplasmodial Activity of Hydroalcoholic Crude Extract and Solvent Fractions ofInfection and drug resistance · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaria is an infectious disease-causing mortality and morbidity in children and adults. Our study planned to measure the antimalarial activity of
methods
resultsChemosuppresive effect exerted by the methanolic crude extract ranged between 27 and 68%, chloroform fraction 52.93-67.73%, hexane fraction 23.61-44.97%, and aqueous fraction 29.48-51.13%. The curative effect of the crude extract was within the range of 25-49%, chloroform fraction 42.78-69.22%, and prophylactic effect of the crude extract was within the range of 51-76.2%% and chloroform fraction 46.57-71.96%. The utmost effect in all tests on chemosuppresive, curative, prophylactic, prevention of weight loss, temperature and packed cell volume, and an increase in mean survival time was observed at higher doses of the crude extract.
conclusionFrom this study, it will be concluded that crude extract of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.