Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33574660›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2021

Journeying through Dementia Randomised Controlled Trial of a Psychosocial Intervention for People Living with Early Dementia: Embedded Qualitative Study with Participants, Carers and Interventionists.

Kirsty Sprange, Jules Beresford-Dent, Gail Mountain, Ben Thomas, Jessica Wright, Clare Mason, Cindy L Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Participant perspectives on online interventions for diverse caregivers of persons living with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kirsty SprangeNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6443-7242
Jules Beresford-DentUniversity of Bradford, Bradford West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK.
Gail MountainUniversity of Bradford, Bradford West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5417-7691
Ben ThomasClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK.
Jessica WrightClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1814-3697
Clare MasonUniversity of Bradford, Bradford West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK.
Cindy L CooperClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK.
University of Bradford · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/140/80
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a complex psychosocial intervention though a study exploring the experiences of participants, carers and interventionists during a trial.

methodsIndividual semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants, their carers, and interventionists from a sample of recruiting sites that took part in the Journeying through Dementia randomized controlled trial (RCT). Interview data were transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Co-researcher data analysis workshops were also conducted to explore researcher interpretations of the data through the lens of those with lived experience of dementia. Triangulation enabled comparison of findings from the interviews with findings from the co-researcher workshops.

resultsThree main themes emerged from the interview data: being prepared; intervention engagement; and participation and outcomes from engagement. From these themes, a number of factors that can moderate delivery and receipt of the intervention as intended were identified. These were context and environment; readiness, training, skills and competencies of the workforce; identifying meaningful participation and relationships.

conclusionThis study highlighted that the observed benefit of the intervention was nuanced for each individual. Mechanisms of change were influenced by a range of individual, social and contextual factors. Future research should therefore consider how best to identify and measure the multifaceted interplay of mechanisms of change in complex interventions.

trial registrationISRCTN17993825.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDementiaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePsychosocial InterventionQualitative Researchdementiaoccupational therapypsychosocialqualitativeself-managementwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID33574660
PMCPMC7872215
OpenAlexW3128830410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.