Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33574486›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Semantic segmentation of reflectance confocal microscopy mosaics of pigmented lesions using weak labels.

Marissa D'Alonzo, Alican Bozkurt, Christi Alessi-Fox, Melissa Gill, Dana H Brooks, Milind Rajadhyaksha, Kivanc Kose, Jennifer G Dy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cutaneous Oncology: Strategies for Melanoma Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marissa D'AlonzoDraper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. mdalonzo@draper.com.
Alican BozkurtElectrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Christi Alessi-FoxCaliber I.D. Inc., Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Melissa GillDepartment of Pathology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, 11203, NY, USA.
Dana H BrooksElectrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Milind RajadhyakshaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, 10022, USA.
Kivanc KoseMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, 10022, USA.
Jennifer G DyElectrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Northeastern University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCaliber Imaging and Diagnostics (United States) · USDraper Laboratory · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Confocal video-mosaicking microscopy to guide surgery of superficially spreading skin cancersR01CA240771 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAMPS, OCTAVIA IRMA, RAJADHYAKSHA, MILIND · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Automated Image Guidance for Diagnosing Skin Cancer With Confocal MicroscopyR01CA199673 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DY, JENNIFER G, RAJADHYAKSHA, MILIND · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199673NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive imaging tool that reduces the need for invasive histopathology for skin cancer diagnoses by providing high-resolution mosaics showing the architectural patterns of skin, which are used to identify malignancies in-vivo. RCM mosaics are similar to dermatopathology sections, both requiring extensive training to interpret. However, these modalities differ in orientation, as RCM mosaics are horizontal (parallel to the skin surface) while histopathology sections are vertical, and contrast mechanism, RCM with a single (reflectance) mechanism resulting in grayscale images and histopathology with multi-factor color-stained contrast. Image analysis and machine learning methods can potentially provide a diagnostic aid to clinicians to interpret RCM mosaics, eventually helping to ease the adoption and more efficiently utilizing RCM in routine clinical practice. However standard supervised machine learning may require a prohibitive volume of hand-labeled training data. In this paper, we present a weakly supervised machine learning model to perform semantic segmentation of architectural patterns encountered in RCM mosaics. Unlike more widely used fully supervised segmentation models that require pixel-level annotations, which are very labor-demanding and error-prone to obtain, here we focus on training models using only patch-level labels (e.g. a single field of view within an entire mosaic). We segment RCM mosaics into "benign" and "aspecific (nonspecific)" regions, where aspecific regions represent the loss of regular architecture due to injury and/or inflammation, pre-malignancy, or malignancy. We adopt Efficientnet, a deep neural network (DNN) proven to accurately accomplish classification tasks, to generate class activation maps, and use a Gaussian weighting kernel to stitch smaller images back into larger fields of view. The trained DNN achieved an average area under the curve of 0.969, and Dice coefficient of 0.778 showing the feasibility of spatial localization of aspecific regions in RCM images, and making the diagnostics decision model more interpretable to the clinicians.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ConfocalHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerSemanticsSkinSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33574486
PMCPMC7878861
OpenAlexW3128687162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.