Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33574450›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Use of multiple metrics to assess antibiotic use in Italian children's hospitals.

Carmen D'Amore, Marta Luisa Ciofi Degli Atti, Carla Zotti, Rosa Prato, Giuliano Guareschi, Raffaele Spiazzi, Gaetano Petitti, Maria Luisa Moro, Massimiliano Raponi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen D'AmoreClinical Pathways and Epidemiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Marta Luisa Ciofi Degli AttiClinical Pathways and Epidemiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy. marta.ciofidegliatti@opbg.net.
Carla ZottiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Rosa PratoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Ospedale "D'Avanzo" Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy.
Giuliano GuareschiOspedale Infantile Regina Margherita - AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Raffaele SpiazziOspedale dei Bambini - ASST Degli Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Gaetano PetittiAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari Ospedale Pediatrico "Giovanni XXIII", Bari, Italy.
Maria Luisa MoroRegional Health and Social Agency, Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy.
Massimiliano RaponiMedical Direction, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITAgenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITOspedale Pediatrico Giovanni XXIII · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of antibiotic utilization is an essential component of antibiotic stewardship programs. In this multicentric study, we used different metrics to evaluate inpatient antibiotic use in children. The study objectives were to describe point prevalence of antibiotic use by indication and patient characteristics, to evaluate DOTs, LOTs and PDDs, and to compare PDDs to DDDs, which assume average maintenance dose per day in adults. All children hospitalized on the days of the study were included. Trained personnel collected demographic and clinical data from patients' clinical records. We recorded information about antibiotics administered on the date of data collection, and in the previous 30 days of hospitalization. Of 810 patients, 380 (46.9%; CI 95%: 43.4-50.4) received one or more antibiotics; prevalence of use was 27.0% for prophylaxis (219/810), and 20.7% (168/810) for treatment. Overall, 587 drugs were issued to the 380 patients receiving antibiotics (1.5 antibiotic per patient). When considering treatments, DOT and LOT per 100 patient-days were 30.5 and 19.1, respectively, resulting in a DOT/LOT ratio of 1.6. PDDs increased with age and approached DDDs only in children aged ≥ 10 years; the ratio between PDDs estimated in children aged ≥ 10 years and in 0-11 month-old infants ranged from 2 for sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, to 25 for meropenem. Our results confirm that DOT, LOT and PDD are better alternatives to DDD in children.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipBenchmarkingChildChild, PreschoolDrug UtilizationFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInpatientsItalyMalePediatricsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33574450
PMCPMC7878731
OpenAlexW3128831113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.