ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2021
Performance and efficiency of machine learning algorithms for analyzing rectangular biomedical data.
Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of machine learning approaches for pediatric asthma exacerbation management: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Assisted Headspace Gas Chromatography Ion Mobility Spectrometry for Characterization and Geographical Authentication of Perillae Folium.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Associations of Normalization and Regularization with Machine Learning Overfitting in Cross-dataset Classification of Deaths Using Transcriptomic and Clinical Data: A Secondary Analysis of Publicly Available Databases.Journal of clinical and translational pathology · 2026Article
- Nonlinear Bivariate Associations and Mononuclear Cell-Type-Specific Expression Level Differences in the STING Signalling Pathway.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Unveiling preeclampsia: diagnostic value and potential molecular mechanisms of abnormally methylated immune-related genes.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026Article
- Medical Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges In Infectious Disease Management.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Comprehensive analysis of metabolic and molecular alterations in the blood of patients with Sjögren's syndrome based on untargeted metabolomics analysis.BMC medical genomics · 2025Observational
- Discrimination of Dried Ginger and Its Different Processed Products: Untargeted Metabolomics, Network Pharmacology, and Machine Learning.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Role of immature granulocyte and blood biomarkers in predicting perforated acute appendicitis using machine learning model.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Integrative analysis of multi-omics data and gut microbiota composition reveals prognostic subtypes and predicts immunotherapy response in colorectal cancer using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Towards machine learning fairness in classifying multicategory causes of deaths in colorectal or lung cancer patients.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Classification of biomedical lung cancer images using optimized binary bat technique by constructing oblique decision trees.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of a novel calculator to predict gonadotropin dose and oocyte yield in oocyte cryopreservation cycles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Normalization and Selecting Non-Differentially Expressed Genes Improve Machine Learning Modelling of Cross-Platform Transcriptomic Data.Transactions on artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Tuina therapy alleviates knee osteoarthritis by modulating PI3K/AKT/mTOR-mediated autophagy: an integrated machine learning andFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of abnormal methylation modification differential expression mRNAs between low-grade and high-grade intervertebral disc degeneration and its correlation with immune cells.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Application of Isokinetic Dynamometry Data in Predicting Gait Deviation Index Using Machine Learning in Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Observational
- A Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Biomedical Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- A simplified approach for efficiency analysis of machine learning algorithms.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most biomedical datasets, including those of 'omics, population studies, and surveys, are rectangular in shape and have few missing data. Recently, their sample sizes have grown significantly. Rigorous analyses on these large datasets demand considerably more efficient and more accurate algorithms. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been used to classify outcomes in biomedical datasets, including random forests (RF), decision tree (DT), artificial neural networks (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM). However, their performance and efficiency in classifying multi-category outcomes of rectangular data are poorly understood. Therefore, we compared these metrics among the 4 ML algorithms. As an example, we created a large rectangular dataset using the female breast cancers in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-18 database, which were diagnosed in 2004 and followed up until December 2016. The outcome was the five-category cause of death, namely alive, non-breast cancer, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other cause. We analyzed the 54 dichotomized features from ~45,000 patients using MatLab (version 2018a) and the tenfold cross-validation approach. The accuracy in classifying five-category cause of death with DT, RF, ANN, and SVM was 69.21%, 70.23%, 70.16%, and 69.06%, respectively, which was higher than the accuracy of 68.12% with multinomial logistic regression. Based on the features' information entropy, we optimized dimension reduction (i.e., reduce the number of features in models). We found 32 or more features were required to maintain similar accuracy, while the running time decreased from 55.57 s for 54 features to 25.99 s for 32 features in RF, from 12.92 s to 10.48 s in ANN, and from 175.50 s to 67.81 s in SVM. In summary, we here show that RF, DT, ANN, and SVM had similar accuracy for classifying multi-category outcomes in this large rectangular dataset. Dimension reduction based on information gain will increase the model's efficiency while maintaining classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33574440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.