Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33574378›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A self-referenced in-situ arrival time monitor for X-ray free-electron lasers.

Michael Diez, Andreas Galler, Sebastian Schulz, Christina Boemer, Ryan N Coffee, Nick Hartmann, Rupert Heider, Martin S Wagner, Wolfram Helml, Tetsuo Katayama and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael DiezEuropean XFEL GmbH, Holzkoppel 4, 22869, Schenefeld, Germany. michael.diez@xfel.eu.
Andreas GallerEuropean XFEL GmbH, Holzkoppel 4, 22869, Schenefeld, Germany.
Sebastian SchulzEuropean XFEL GmbH, Holzkoppel 4, 22869, Schenefeld, Germany. sebastian.schulz@desy.de.
Christina BoemerEuropean XFEL GmbH, Holzkoppel 4, 22869, Schenefeld, Germany.
Ryan N CoffeeSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Nick HartmannSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Rupert HeiderPhysik-Department E11, Technical University of Munich, James-Frank-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Martin S WagnerPhysik-Department E11, Technical University of Munich, James-Frank-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Wolfram HelmlPhysik-Department E11, Technical University of Munich, James-Frank-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Tetsuo KatayamaJapan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo, 679-5198, Japan.
Tokushi SatoCenter for Free-Electron Laser Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestraße 85, 22607, Hamburg, Germany.
Takahiro SatoSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Makina YabashiJapan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo, 679-5198, Japan.
Christian BresslerEuropean XFEL GmbH, Holzkoppel 4, 22869, Schenefeld, Germany. christian.bressler@xfel.eu.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 05K16PE1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB925 (TP A4)Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute 2017A8072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a novel, highly versatile, and self-referenced arrival time monitor for measuring the femtosecond time delay between a hard X-ray pulse from a free-electron laser and an optical laser pulse, measured directly on the same sample used for pump-probe experiments. Two chirped and picosecond long optical supercontinuum pulses traverse the sample with a mutually fixed time delay of 970 fs, while a femtosecond X-ray pulse arrives at an instant in between both pulses. Behind the sample the supercontinuum pulses are temporally overlapped to yield near-perfect destructive interference in the absence of the X-ray pulse. Stimulation of the sample with an X-ray pulse delivers non-zero contributions at certain optical wavelengths, which serve as a measure of the relative arrival time of the X-ray pulse with an accuracy of better than 25 fs. We find an excellent agreement of our monitor with the existing timing diagnostics at the SACLA XFEL with a Pearson correlation value of 0.98. We demonstrate a high sensitivity to measure X-ray pulses with pulse energies as low as 30 [Formula: see text]J. Using a free-flowing liquid jet as interaction sample ensures the full replacement of the sample volume for each X-ray/optical event, thus enabling its utility even at MHz repetition rate XFEL sources.

Identifiers

PMID33574378
PMCPMC7878505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.