Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33574259›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Diagnostic accuracy of cytology for the detection of endometrial cancer in urine and vaginal samples.

Helena O'Flynn, Neil A J Ryan, Nadira Narine, David Shelton, Durgesh Rana, Emma J Crosbie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Screening and risk reducing surgery for endometrial or ovarian cancers in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helena O'FlynnGynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Neil A J RyanGynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Nadira NarineManchester Cytology Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7563-329X
David SheltonManchester Cytology Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Durgesh RanaManchester Cytology Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Emma J CrosbieGynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK. Emma.crosbie@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0284-8630
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2018-11-ST2-054Department of Health IS-BRC-1215-20007Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-009Medical Research Council MR/M018431/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmenopausal bleeding triggers urgent investigation by sequential invasive tests that are avoidable for the 90-95% of women who do not have endometrial cancer. A simple, non-invasive tool that accurately identifies cancer and safely reassures healthy women could transform patient care. Here we report, in a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study of 103 women with known cancer and 113 with unexplained postmenopausal bleeding, that urine and vaginal cytology has a combined sensitivity of 91.7% (95% CI 85.0%, 96.1%) and specificity of 88.8% (81.2%, 94.1%) for gynecological cancer detection. Cytology identifies 91 endometrial, two fallopian tube and one cervical cancer from 103 known cancer cases. In women with unexplained postmenopausal bleeding, cytology identifies all four endometrial cancers and three others (cervical, ovarian and bladder), for a 12/107 (11.2%) false positive rate. We show proof-of-principle that endometrial cancer can be detected in urine and vaginal fluid. Prospective validation of these findings will support incorporation of this non-invasive test into clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesCytological TechniquesEndometrial NeoplasmsFallopian TubesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUrineUterine Cervical NeoplasmsUterine Hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID33574259
PMCPMC7878864
OpenAlexW3127350545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.