ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2021
A pulse survey: assessment and management of bone loss in spinal cord injury.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designAn online survey
objectivesTo describe current clinical practices regarding osteoporosis assessment and management in people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) and compare them to recommended diagnostic tests and interventions.
settingAn international collaboration surveying professionals working in SCI Medicine.
methodsOnline cross-sectional survey regarding clinical practice trends in the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis in people with SCI. Assessment of whether discrete professional characteristics influenced practices and if those practices were consistent with recommendations from professional organizations.
resultsEighty-two professionals working in SCI Medicine completed the survey. Respondents were equally likely to test for bone loss during the post-acute phase (between 4- and 18-months post injury) and after low impact fracture (41.46% and 42.68%, respectively) and more likely to test during the chronic phase (51.22%). The majority of respondents (n = 56, 70%) assessed bone density with DXA at the hip, and many (48.78%, n = 40) prescribed simultaneous mobilization, vitamin D and calcium to prevent bone loss in the acute, post-acute and chronic phases. A number of evaluations and interventions were inconsistent with best practice recommendations.
conclusionsGiven that reported practices for detection and treatment of osteoporosis in SCI are inconsistent and not data-driven, there is need for dissemination and adoption of existing clinical practice guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.